Andrew Lush, Water Protector

Andrew Lush, Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water (submitted)

PEI Drinking Water Quality

by Andrew Lush, originally published in The Guardian, May 2024

Prince Edward Island is unusual in that we rely entirely upon groundwater from wells to supply our drinking (and other) water needs. The quality of groundwater (which we drink) and surface water (in streams and estuaries) is affected by agricultural chemicals, effluent from septic systems, run-off during heavy rain events, and other pollution sources.

We see fish kills and anoxia in our estuaries as outward signs of our water quality problem, but not so visible is the effect on our drinking water.

Pollution of our water was the number one issue that was most frequently mentioned during the Water Act public consultations in 2017. If you were there, you will remember that was a time when 46 organizations presented, and 85 other submissions were made, at 12 public meetings. This was an example of true public participation which, unfortunately, has stagnated since then with little opportunity for input from the public or from knowledgeable individuals and experts.

We must work towards reducing the effect of this pollution on our drinking water. It is in the interest of all of us, including farmers, fishers, and wildlife, to reduce the use of expensive chemicals on the land. Farming organizations, watershed groups, Living Labs, the Agri-Watershed Partnership, and other groups, are actively working to find ways to reduce chemical inputs. Unfortunately our government appears to have dropped the ball on the Water Act and that does not help.

There are ways that we can test for, and protect ourselves from, unwelcome chemicals in our drinking water. Tests undertaken over the past two decades show that many school drinking water supplies, as well as some municipal supplies, have detectable levels of multiple pesticides. One test of school water showed an Atrazine level at 13% of the recommended safe level.

Unfortunately, testing for pesticides is expensive and only one litre per year is tested at each school, which does not constitute a thorough testing regime by any measure. Also, the cumulative effect of long-term exposure and the safe levels for children have been studied very little. When two or more pesticides are in the water, even at miniscule levels, their toxicity is amplified.

Many chemicals have had their safe levels revised downwards, their use restricted, and some have been banned entirely in recent years, so taking precautions to remove them from drinking water supplies is a good idea.

Luckily one solution is pretty straightforward – many Islanders have installed carbon block filters on their drinking water supplies to remove any traces of pesticides and heavy metals, as it is likely that most wells have some levels of pesticides in the water.

There are many good under-the-sink systems that are easy to install and the filters, which need replacing annually, only cost around $150. Unfortunately, our schools do not have these filters as our government mistakenly believes that the current situation is satisfactory. This solution does not help fish or other wildlife, but at least it prevents unnecessary human exposure.

A good proportion of Island wells have nitrate levels that are higher than the safe recommended level, which is 10mg/L nitrate-nitrogen, and many more have nitrate levels that are known to cause health issues for the very young. Despite decades of studies, and consistent calls for action, over the past three decades PEI has experienced a steady increase in the level of nitrates in drinking water. The majority of the nitrate in our water comes from agricultural fertilizer that leaches into groundwater, as a result of modern (and often unsustainable) methods of production.

Nitrates can easily be tested for in drinking water, indeed it is part of the annual free water test available to Islanders.

While getting your water tested for nitrates, you can also have coliform (bacteria) and general chemistry tests done at the same time. If nitrates are present at high levels, a reverse osmosis or ion exchange system can be installed in your home. UV light (for bacteria) and carbon block filters (for pesticides and heavy metals) will not reduce the nitrate levels.

Perhaps one day the right to clean water and clean air will be enshrined in our Island’s laws. Meanwhile it would be a move in the right direction to properly test water in schools and public facilities for pesticides, and also to install precautionary filters in these buildings to reduce our exposure to harmful chemicals. Government subsidies to provide carbon block filters for all houses, and mitigation systems for houses where the nitrate level is unsafe, would also be a great move, so that Islanders aren’t forced to bear the costs of an ongoing pollution problem that government has failed to address for so long.

The Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water supports these measures that mitigate the effect of this pollution, at least for our drinking water, but the long term solution has to be a much better effort by our government – including allowing non-government organisations to participate in the mechanisms, such as a water governance committee, that were supposed to be built in to our Water Act but have fallen by the wayside. Active public engagement, public oversight, and public involvement in water governance has unfortunately not yet happened.

Andrew Lush
Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water
May 2024

NOT ENOUGH VOICES AT STRATEGY TABLE

Boyd Allen, Published in the Charlottetown Guardian, January 5, 2022

In July 2020 the legislature passed a motion placing a moratorium on construction of new agricultural holding ponds. This motion passed by a 15 to 10 margin but was non-binding. This translates into government not being obligated to honour the motion’s intent if they choose not to.

It appears that these holding ponds are set to become an integral part of proposed drought contingency plans, a key component to the forthcoming irrigation strategy.

I use the word “appears’ because there is no way of discerning whether they are or are not. This strategy is being put together within the senior ranks of the provincial departments directly involved. There was the opportunity for Islanders to anonymously offer online comments on the proposed strategy, but this portal was slammed shut on Dec. 13. Organizations actively engaged in the Water Act process made several attempts to meet with the minister and/or department officials to talk about this irrigation strategy. These requests have so far not even been acknowledged.

Continue reading “NOT ENOUGH VOICES AT STRATEGY TABLE”

Agroecology as a Basis for Irrigation Strategy

By Trudy White, Iris

One would expect that any irrigation or soil improvement strategy being developed for our Island would be grounded in the most current scientific knowledge on soil health and would address the very serious issues of declining soil biodiversity and pesticides in soil, water, and sediment.  Yet this irrigation strategy discussion document does not even mention the words biodiversity or pesticides.

Science clearly tells us that protecting and restoring soil biodiversity is critical for soil regeneration and resilience and also for sustaining our water cycle.  But the document fails to mention “increasing biodiversity” even in its sections about Improved Environmental Benefits or Soil Health.

Continue reading “Agroecology as a Basis for Irrigation Strategy”

PEI Chapter of Council of Canadians Responds to Irrigation Strategy

There is no vision nor much hope offered (in this Irrigation Strategy document) for the protection of PEI’s water and land. As Islanders, like the rest of the world, we face the most serious crisis in history – the climate crisis – yet, we are presented with a document that ignores the crisis and gives a ‘license’ for the continuation of an industrial model of farming controlled by very powerful corporate interests.  A model of farming by all accounts that is not sustainable and is doomed – and a major contributor to the climate crisis. 

Continue reading “PEI Chapter of Council of Canadians Responds to Irrigation Strategy”

Guiding Principles for an Irrigation Strategy

By Don Mazer, on behalf of the Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water

The Irrigation Strategy (IS) document is the culmination of what began as the exemplary process of public consultation that resulted the Water Act. This process reflected widespread public opposition to ending the moratorium on high capacity (HC) wells. It is ironic that the outcome of this extended process was a plan to enable the return of HC wells.  It is unfortunate that this decision seemed to be based almost entirely on the will of the minister,  who seemed to require little evidence, and had little interest in meaningful consultation with citizens or even his own standing committee.

The result is an ‘irrigation strategy` that offers limited opportunities for meaningful input from Islanders. This document should have been the result of a public process that engaged citizens. Rather, it was developed quietly and internally by the department and its bureaucrats and whomever they chose to consult with. This did not include our group, the Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water. Our coalition includes a broad range of environmental, watershed and socially concerned groups and individuals. From the first days, we have been deeply involved in the process of developing the Water Act, and acknowledged by a previous Minister in the legislature for its important contribution to the Act.  We are concerned why a group like ours with such a longstanding commitment to PEI water would not be included in such consultations.

Continue reading “Guiding Principles for an Irrigation Strategy”

A Framework for Water Governance

By Gary Schneider, Environmental Coalition of PEI and member of the Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water

The province’s new Irrigation Strategy is a document that all water users – not just those who use irrigation in whatever form that takes – should take a long, hard look at.  The development of the Water Act started out as an exemplary template for meaningful public participation.  Unfortunately, over time, the process has become less and less transparent and responsive.

One way to get things back on track is to return to sound participatory processes. Any strategy is only as good as its implementation. The water governance body, an independent, arms-length, representative body to ensure proper implementation, is an idea that has been repeatedly brought forward by the Coalition for the Protection of PEI Water and other stakeholders.  The Irrigation Strategy pledges that “In addition to the administration of permits being delivered by a central body, irrigation will also be overseen by a central advisory board.  This board will be tasked with ensuring the continuation of strategy finds the balance between environmental protection and commercial usage.  This board will consist of users, conservation groups, senior government officials and other key stakeholders.”

How do we make this body truly representative?  The provincial Round Table on Resource Land Use and Stewardship had representatives from a variety of sectors – agricultural, tourism, conservation, forestry, aquaculture, municipalities, recreational fisheries, etc.  This body worked together and came up with some great recommendations that have become part of our way of life.  Unfortunately, many others were not fully adopted, or not adopted at all, leading to continued environmental degradation.

Continue reading “A Framework for Water Governance”

Two steps back on P.E.I. Water Act

Public engagement holds little traction with the current P.E.I. government

The Guardian (Charlottetown)- 26 Nov 2021

BOYD ALLEN is on the board of the Citizens’ Alliance of P.E.I., a member organization of the Coalition for the Protection of P.E.I. Water.

In May of 2016 the P.E.I. environmental advisory committee released a comprehensive report entitled: Water Act – Public consultation report. It was 58 footnoted pages long including indices and glossary. It collated findings from the first phase of public consultations on the Water Act from July 2015 to January 2016.

This process offered multiple opportunities and methods for private citizens and organizations to present their opinions. The response was extraordinary. There were 50 presentations at the various public community meetings and 12 one on one consultations between the EAC and concerned organizations. Every submission to the EAC during this time was made easily available online.

Continue reading “Two steps back on P.E.I. Water Act”

General Meeting – Tuesday July 27 at 6pm

It’s been a long time since members of the Water Coalition have met – and much has happened lately, with regards to the Water Act and the moratorium on high capacity wells. So it seems like a good time to come together, to spend some time reflecting on all of that.

Several members of the coalition, “a core group”, have been making presentations, speaking in the media and writing letters to the editor on behalf of the entire coalition. We want to check in with the rest of the membership, to make sure we are properly reflecting the original goals and purpose of the coalition. And to talk about our membership, which includes environmental and social justice groups as well as individuals.

In- person, Tuesday, July 27 at 6:00 pm at the PEI Farm Centre

Ending the moratorium: Credible science and comprehensive data or empty rhetoric and baseless reassurances?

Don Mazer and Boyd Allen

Part l.

The Water Act Process: From exemplary public consultation to industry led policy

It took 7 years, but now Prince Edward Island finally proclaimed a Water Act. There are certainly reasons to celebrate this. The Act contains guiding values that recognize water as a common good and a public trust. There is acknowledgment of the precautionary principle and the need to preserve water for future generations.   Yet, how much the Act will help to remedy the poor track record of the Government and its departments in protecting PEI’s waters remains to be seen.

The impetus for the development of the Water Act began at Legislative Standing Committee meetings in 2014. The potato processing industry was pressuring government to lift the moratorium on high capacity wells for agriculture, and many citizens and groups opposed this.

Continue reading “Ending the moratorium: Credible science and comprehensive data or empty rhetoric and baseless reassurances?”

Nitrates Levels in Drinking Water

Rural Islanders are at a disadvantage when it comes to clean drinking water

Andrew Lush
published on Tuesday, July 6th, 2021, in The Guardian

Islanders heartily endorse those governments which ensure the personal health and well-being of all of our residents both rural and urban.


Rural residents are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to clean drinking water.
Nitrate levels in private well water can be disturbingly high, with the P.E.I. government’s own Open Data Portal (data.princeedwardisland.ca) identifying that between 2014 and 2019, eight per cent of samples taken from private wells were above the US EPA safe level, and many more samples exceeded the safe guideline for feeding to babies.

Continue reading “Nitrates Levels in Drinking Water”